It’s been quiet around here the last weeks, as regular visitors may have noticed. This is partly due to the fact that I am mostly busy with work and family, and rarely take the time to actively work in this site. I also started to post links to interesting news and articles to my facebook page almost exclusively, except for those which I find very important.
The other reason for the more recent silence is that my trusted Dell Latitude E5400 laptop, which I have been using both for work and private for the past two years, has suffered a failure of harddisk and battery almost simultaneously. I was lucky that I was able to salvage almost all of my important data before the disk broke down entirely.
I have been lucky with the Dell, I must say, except for the fact that this is now the second harddisk that broke down. The first one said goodbye when I accidentally dropped the laptop from a substantial height — this was also when its body got some major cracks. The second one said goodbye a short while after the battery died, when the power adapter slipped from the connector while Windows was in the middle of performing various writing and reading operations.
Since I also need my laptop for work (I am writing my dissertation on it), I had to get a replacement as quickly as possible. Since my budget is limited, I decided on an entry-level ThinkPad, the Edge 15 from 2010. I had owned a ThinkPad before — when they were still IBM-made –, and was thus positive that you can’t go wrong with one. Little did I know …
It seems that since Lenovo has taken over IBMs PC department, the quality has gone down substantially. Sure, if you’re willing to pay € 2k you can still get a top notch laptop (W series). But it seems that ThinkPad isn’t automatically ThinkPad these days. The Edge series is the best example. It’s Lenovo’s entry-level ThinkPad, meant for those that would otherwise have gone with one of the consumer models (Lenovo still consider the ThinkPad series professional, but not all of them qualify for that predication).
I read in reviews beforehand that build quality is far from what we are used to see in ThinkPads, but for me personally, it would’ve been sufficient. Okay, so the body is all plastic, but it’s solid. Not as solid as a MacBook with its magnesium body, but solid enough. The upside of the cheaper plastic body is that it’s very light. The keyboard is also cheap, but that’s okay, too. It’s good enough to work with — I’ve seen keyboards far inferior. The nice thing about the Edge is that it has a very large trackpad that supports multi-touch gestures, and a large and nice-to-use trackpoint located between the G, H and B keys. I love trackpoints, and this was one of the reaons to get a ThinkPad again. (My Dell had a trackpoint as well, but a smaller one — nowhere near as nice as this one!)
What’s funny about the Edge is that it lacks status lights of any kind. No indicator for power, for battery status, for caps lock, WiFi etc. Everything is displayed in Windows via on-screen pop-ups. This means extra background processes, which means extra CPU and memory use. Not the best solution. But this isn’t acually the worst part. I could’ve lived with its mediocre build quality and other quirks if it weren’t for that awful screen.
It seems this is where Lenovo have been cutting short the most. Reviews confirm that the screen is infact cheap, bad and plain useless. Not only does it have no colour accuracy to speak of, the pixel spacing is so large that you can make out single pixels (including separating black lines between them!) even from a viewing distance of 30 centimeters. Contrast is also practically non-existent. To sum it up: not only is it absolutely unsuited for any kind of work on photos, it is also unsuited for any kind of work. At least this is my personal assessment — the screen makes my eyes hurt and gives me headaches.
So I decided to send the ThinkPad back and look for something else. But all the laptops I tried — brands ranging from Acer to Sony –, those that cost less than a thousand Euros have bad screens. Compared to my old Dell, all of them are rubbish.
So what am I going to do? Well, here’s the plan. I have just ordered a new battery for my Dell in the hope that it really was just the battery that had died, and that there’s not a problem with the charging circuitry on the mainboard. If the new battery works, I will buy a new harddisk and new keyboard (the trackpoint stopped working properly when it was about a year old) and continue to work with it, despite the fact that the body is cracked and the card reader will only read, but not write on SD cards. At least I know I’ll have a good screen that I can use for both office work and photo editing.
If that fails there’s only one option: a MacBook. Why a MacBook? Well, quite simply, MacBooks have the best screens. Period. I tried one yesterday, and I was thrilled. Superb contrast, superb colour rendition. The only downside is that they’re glossy. But for photo work, they seem to be the non-plus-ultra. Also, since I’m officially still a student, I will get a discount of about 10% on any Apple product. Then, there’s the factor of build quality, which is simply superb as well. And finally, the 13″ MacBook is small and light and thus ideal for commuting and trave alike.
But there’s one thing … the price tag. Even with discount, a MacBook is still over a thousand Euros — money I do not have lying around my house anywhere. So I hope that I can get my Dell back running — otherwise I’ll have to come up with a good financial plan …
Got a W520 at work lately, and they run and handle very well. However, the screen is utterly crap, really nothing I’d recommend to a photographer. Even Lenovo’s desktop screens (I have a 22 inch 1680×1050 at work) are not that much better, and have another quite disturbing hue problem. My 24″ Samsung at home was cheap, but feels like a super calibrated device against those others…
You’re right about Macs. While I don’t like proprietary systems anymore, these are photographers’ tools without question. And at least that OS is 1000 times better than anything from Redmond (it’s BSD Unix based as you might know, tho it hides this as much as it can).
My solution? Linux on a desktop (my wife also uses it on a cheap Thinkpad, beside her own desktop). Runs error- and virus-free, but with no proprietary stuff (read: nothing from Adobe for instance). So if you need “industry standard” programs, there’s nothing much else than a Mac anyway.
Thanks for the interesting insight, Wolfgang. I must say that I am surprised that you find the W-series’ screen so bad — it was rated very good in reviews and said to be ideal for photo editing work once it is properly calibrated. Maybe your model has the mondays?
Linux is no solution for me, though. I have tried it several times, the last time was with the latest Ubuntu release, and I just can’t become frieds with it. For work, it is sufficient — I can run Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice. But for private, I have built my workflow around many Windows based programs that I cannot do without.
Of course a double boot system is always possible, running Windows and Linux side-by-side. But then I’d rather have Windows and OS X side-by-side …
P.S.: About the “industry standard” grade programs: just bought (paid for) my trial version of Corel AfterShot Pro (formerly Bibble Pro) yesterday evening. So much for using only open source, and nothing proprietary 😉 But I can definitely recommend that for Linux, it does some things which even LR cannot do. For very fine detailed colour rendition, and sharpening, the free and open source RawTherapee (also available for Windows and Macs) beats it hands down tho, so I always use both (or RawTherapee after Olympus Viewer 2).
The W520 screen may be good for presentations, but surely not for photographers. Dunno if it can successfully be calibrated, I don’t have the hardware for that yet. At work, that’s not important, and maybe impossible anyway, since we often use multi-monitor setups, and I don’t know if you could calibrate the built-in display differently from an external one…
I bought my 24″ Samsung monitor at home after seeing a photo slide show on it in a shop – maybe that explains the difference. The colours just looked right, and after tweaking them a bit at home, they looked even better. I’m going to calibrate it as soon as I can, but I bet I’m not that far off anyway.
Another one (and please excuse the “comment flooding”): the Olympus Viewer 2 is also Windows- and Mac-only, so I use that one on a virtualized Windows 7, using Oracle’s (formerly Sun’s) VirtualBox. I gave the Windows image just 1.5 Gig Memory, which is enough for single tasking work like working on a picture at a time. Boots up very quick, and shuts down even faster (without any virus scanners or such), but of course AfterShot Pro, running on my bare-metal 64 bit Debian and using all processor cores is much faster (for instance when zooming in to 100%).
Feel free to drop me an email if you have questions, and think I could possibly help you – you’ll be welcome. I used to build and sell even Laptops, but cannot do that anymore (no business, and no contact to any Asus barebone vendors anymore).